Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011
Kultur 3
For the first group of readings I read “Germany looks to tighten up drinking rules”, “Forget the Mett try a Frikadelle”, and “What about the Turks? An Introduction to Germany’s real fast food joints”. Regarding the first article, it is very understandable that a cultural tradition renders the enforcement of the law difficult and its practical benefit minimal. Yet, I was startled to see that the main argument was this opposed the drinkers’ civil rights. In America, we would say that you only have a right ‘to’ something so long as it does not conflict with an individual’s right ‘from’ something. I don’t know German law but I am assuming that to some degree intoxicated people are freed from conscious intent in the legal system. Enforced interaction with this person would then definitely violate others’ civil rights. I was very amused by the “Optimists are Idiots” article and it was a great example of German ideology. Yet, I hope that Kimberly Bradley never makes an attempt to interpret a philosopher again. Or at least next time she should say ‘according to my feeble interpretation of someone’s summary of Nietzsche’. The first claim was fine, the last three were not. I am amused that the death of a figure who banishes endless people to eternal hell for trivial sins, or per Dante, even intellectualism, could be listed next to “we’re all doomed”. Sam Engel
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
Hinweis: Nur ein Mitglied dieses Blogs kann Kommentare posten.